so the radius of the claymore for example is half as wide when it has a smart choke. my personal feel is that the radius of the shotgun's targeting reticule and the radius of the spread is reduced by the smart choke %. With the shotgun smart choke and marksman active, low accuracy shotguns like the piranha become basically pinpoint accurate. I'd take it case-by-case and test your preferred weapon on the range, since you can compare side-by-side targets with or without the mod attached.ĪP mods definitely appear to stack with AP ammo and even further with weapons that come standard with it (Javelin/Widow/Black widow) though without proper testing i could not say for sure the overall effectiveness, i did, however get 3 guardians with one shot like this once! Corvette3 12:05, Ma(UTC) It also makes the weapon more ammo-efficient. Obviously, high-damage weapons benefit from the one-shot kill possibility, but it's always a viable choice. Assuming you don't miss, it simply makes that weapon perform x% better regardless of how low the damage is. It's certainly worth additional damage, since it's a percentage improvement. Is it worth using damage upgrades on low-damage weapons, accuracy upgrades on inaccurate weapons, etc (SMGs, for example)? The green extension bars on the statistics look small, and it isn't clear that there's an advantage in using these upgrades.Īlso, does armor-penetrating upgrade stack with armor-piercing ammo? Comments not supporing and supporting the move have been moved there for ease of reference and for future reference.
Just to note, that the move proposal is below in the section titled "Move Proposal". They've been referred to as 'upgrades', but the important thing, I think, is that in the UI where you choose and assign them, they're called "Weapon Mods". Go Bruins! 20:50, Febru(UTC) That's not a bad idea. Maybe but most of them upgrade the weapon's performance in some fashion. Should this page not be named "Weapon Mods"?
23 Sniper Rifle Concentration Mod number not shown.12 "This information is covered elsewhere".
0 kommentar(er)
